Critical Magic Theory: An Analytical Harry Potter Podcast

• Prof Responds: The Power, The Pettiness, and The Pretty

  In this lively and deeply engaging episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble responds to the fiery post-episode discussion about Tom Riddle. From dissecting the many hilarious and shady nicknames the CMT community bestowed upon Voldemort to unpacking the complexities of his insecurities, Julian dives deep into what makes Tom Riddle tick. Topics range from the imposter syndrome and theatrics that defined Voldemort’s rise to power, to his surprising nostalgia for Hogwarts, and even the role of pretty privilege in his early manipulations. Plus, Julian tackles the thorny discourse around love potions, consent, and whether Voldemort’s “loveless” conception actually shaped his villainy. With a signature mix of humor, insight, and beats to bop to, this Prof Responds episode is not one to miss—just make sure you’ve stretched before hitting play. And as always, the post-episode chat on Patreon is bound to be lit.

  --------  

  49:58
• [Tom] Riddle Me this: The origin story of a pick me

  In this episode of Critical Magic Theory, we begin our deep dive into the origins of Lord Voldemort by unpacking the complexities of Tom Riddle Jr. Professor Julian Wamble explores what made young Tom tick—his ambitions, insecurities, and relentless desire to prove himself in the Wizarding World. Was he a textbook Slytherin, or did his ego ultimately undermine his ambitions? Is he a victim of his upbringing, or was his villainy inevitable? From his desperate need for external validation to his obsession with rewriting his own identity, we trace the moments that shaped Tom Riddle into the Dark Lord. We also delve into psychological insights from a clinical psychologist, questioning whether he was truly a psychopath or simply a product of deep-seated trauma. Join us as we challenge the myth of Voldemort’s self-confidence, analyze the sheer pettiness of his anagrammed name, and examine whether his master plan was ever as foolproof as he thought. And, of course, stay tuned for the next episode, where we transition from “Tommy J” to the fully transformed Voldemort, post-nose. A special thanks to our new Patreon Deep Divers- Molly, Samantha, Sam, Kathryn, Meena. 

  --------  

  1:15:40
• PROF RESPONDS 2- PUREBLOOD SHOWDOWN

  With chaos, controversy, and critical insight, Professor Julian Wamble dives into the passionate post-episode discussion following the Pure-Blood Showdown episode. With the fandom in an uproar over Narcissa Malfoy being crowned Best Parent, Julian unpacks the arguments from Patreon listeners, exploring the biases and dynamics at play in how fans judge “good” and “bad” parenting in the Wizarding World. The conversation extends to the contentious Worst Son designation for Barty Crouch Jr., with Julian examining the complexities of his relationship with Barty Crouch Sr. and how parental expectations shape perceptions of character morality. Shifting gears, a Half-Blood Primer is introduced, setting the stage for upcoming episodes on Voldemort and other half-blood characters. The discussion highlights the vast spectrum of half-blood identities in the Wizarding World, debunking misconceptions and emphasizing the nuanced ways heritage and socialization shape a wizard’s experience. 

  --------  

  29:43
• It's a Pureblood Showdown: The Best, The Worst, and Everything in Between

  BUST OUT YOUR YEARBOOKS!! It's time for the best and worst of the Purebloods! In this episode of Critical Magic Theory, we wrap up our epic 14-month journey through the world of pure bloods. We explore what it truly means to be a pureblood in the Wizarding World—unpacking the social constructs, privileges, and pressures that shape their identities. From the tension between external validation and unapologetic individuality to the insidious nature of pure blood supremacy, we dive deep into how these characters are socialized, perceived, and ultimately remembered.Huge thanks to our Patreon Deep Divers—Carlisa, Carrie, Hannah, Aisling, Hannah L, and Ika—your support means the world!Now, buckle up, because this one’s a wild ride!

  --------  

  1:18:49
• Prof Responds: LAVENDER BROWN

  In this special mini-episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble introduces a new segment: Prof Responds. This segment is designed to continue the discussion from the Patreon post-episode chat, allowing deeper engagement with listeners’ comments and insights. The focus of this episode is Lavender Brown, exploring how race and gender intersect in the portrayal of her character. Professor Wamble examines the controversy surrounding Lavender’s race change in the Harry Potter films and the implications of representation, particularly how Black girls are often denied the carefree, “silly” portrayals that white teenage girls receive. The episode also touches on Lavender’s fate in the Battle of Hogwarts, questioning why she was chosen for such a violent and unsettling end at the hands of Fenrir Greyback. Wamble explores possible authorial intent behind this decision and its gendered implications. A broader discussion emerges on what it means to be a “good” Pureblood, challenging the high moral expectations often placed on characters and the reality that most individuals in privileged groups may not be active in dismantling oppressive systems.This conversation extends to the gendered nature of Gryffindor traits, questioning how courage and heroism in the series are often coded as masculine and how this affects perceptions of characters like Lavender and Hermione. Next up: a Chaotic ranking of the Best and Worst Purebloods!

  --------  

  40:11

More Arts podcasts

Trending Arts podcasts

About Critical Magic Theory: An Analytical Harry Potter Podcast