PodcastsNewsHDTV and Home Theater Podcast

HDTV and Home Theater Podcast

HT Guys
HDTV and Home Theater Podcast
Latest episode

814 episodes

  • HDTV and Home Theater Podcast

    Podcast #1243: Set Top Box Shootout

    06/03/2026 | 36 mins.
    On this week's show we have a shootout between four set top boxes and we try to determine which one is best for you. We also read your email and take a look at the week's email.
    News:
    Netflix Walks With A Cool $2.8 Billion Breakup Fee: Who Gets What In New Paramount-WBD Merger Proposal
    Viewers Continue To 'Struggle' With Sports Program Discovery
    Samsung Wallet's 'Digital Home Key' lets me use my phone to open my doors
    Set Top Box Shootout 
    On last week's show, in response to a news story,  Ara asked why would someone use a FireTV set top box over ones from Apple, Google, or Roku. So for this week we decided to do a comparison of them all and try to identify who each product would benefit the most. 
    For this comparison we looked at the Apple TV 4K (latest 3rd-gen model from 2022, still current), Google TV Streamer (the modern successor to Chromecast with Google TV), Roku (focusing on high-end like Roku Ultra or Streaming Stick 4K), and Amazon Fire TV (focusing on popular models like Fire TV Stick 4K Max or Cube).
    All support 4K HDR streaming including Dolby Vision, major apps (Netflix, Disney+, etc.), and voice remotes. In a nutshell, the differences come down to your ecosystem, interface, performance, ads, and price.
    Apple TV 4K
    Price range: ~$129–$149 (64GB Wi-Fi or 128GB Wi-Fi + Ethernet).
    Key specs: A15 Bionic chip (fast/smooth), Wi-Fi 6, optional Ethernet, Dolby Vision/Atmos/HDR10+, Thread smart home hub, USB-C Siri Remote.
    Pros:
    Premium, ad-free high performance interface with fast app loading.
    Excellent integration with Apple ecosystem (iPhone, iPad, Mac, AirPlay, Apple TV+, Fitness+, Arcade).
    Superior picture/audio quality, privacy focus (less tracking), and acts as a smart home hub.
    Great for gaming (Apple Arcade) and high-end home theater setups.
    Cons:
    Most expensive option.
    Less neutral—prioritizes Apple content/services.
    Fewer "free/ad-supported" channels compared to rivals.
    Best for: Apple users and those wanting a premium, ad free experience.
    Google TV Streamer 
    Price range: ~$90–$100 (Buy Now).
    Key specs: Powerful processor (faster than old Chromecast), 32GB storage, Wi-Fi 6, Ethernet, Dolby Vision/Atmos, Google Home/Matter smart home support, hands-free options in some setups.
    Pros:
    Intuitive, personalized interface with excellent content discovery/search across services.
    Strong Google ecosystem integration (YouTube, Nest, Google Assistant, synced watchlists).
    Good performance/speed, supports cloud gaming, and broad app support.
    Balanced neutral approach.
    Cons:
    Some ads and recommendations can feel cluttered.
    More expensive than basic sticks but cheaper than Apple.
    Interface may prioritize Google content slightly.
    Best for: Google/Android users or those wanting smart recommendations and smart home features.
    Roku (Ultra or Streaming Stick 4K)
    Price range: ~$30–$100 (Buy Now).
    Key specs: Fast quad-core processor (in Ultra), Wi-Fi 6, Ethernet (Ultra), Dolby Vision/Atmos/HDR10+, rechargeable Voice Remote Pro (Ultra), broad smart home compatibility.
    Pros:
    Simple, neutral, user-friendly interface with huge app/channel selection (including tons of free/ad-supported content).
    No heavy ecosystem bias—treats all services equally.
    Often the most affordable high-quality options; great search/universal watchlist.
    Compatible with Alexa, Google, Apple Home; highly popular among cord-cutters.
    Cons:
    Can feel slower on lower-end models compared to premium rivals.
    Some ads on home screen.
    Less "smart home hub" depth than Apple/Google.
    Best for: Most people—especially beginners or those wanting value and neutrality.
    Amazon Fire TV (Fire TV Stick 4K Max or Cube)
    Price range: ~$25–$60 Sticks (Buy Now) to ~$100+ Cube (Buy Now).
    Key specs: Fast processor/Wi-Fi 6E (Max), Dolby Vision/Atmos, Alexa voice, Ambience mode, Ethernet (Cube).
    Pros:
    Very affordable, especially on sale.
    Quick performance and deep Amazon Prime integration (Prime Video priority).
    Excellent Alexa/smart home control (Ring, Echo, etc.).
    Good app support and features like live TV guides.
    Cons:
    Heavy ads and Prime content promotion (can feel pushy/cluttered).
    Interface prioritizes Amazon ecosystem over neutrality.
    Privacy concerns with more tracking.
    Best for: Amazon Prime members or Alexa/Echo households on a budget.
    Overall, Roku wins for broad appeal and value, while we give the nod to the Apple TV 4K for premium quality, and the Google TV Streamer excels for smart features. Choose based on your ecosystem (Apple/Google/Amazon) or if you want neutral/no-fuss just go with Roku.
  • HDTV and Home Theater Podcast

    Podcast #1242: A New Standard for HDTV

    27/02/2026 | 20 mins.
    On this week's show Braden is on vacation but don't worry! We still have a show for you. Ara reads your emails and takes a look at the week's news. He also takes a look at an article in CNET that claims: The LG Evo AI G5 OLED is the new standard for TVs.
    News:
    Amazon is finally rolling out some much-needed upgrades to Fire TV
    New TV before 'RAMageddon'? Prices expected to rise
    Others:
    Take Over Tuesday: Featuring Buzz Schneider of the 1980 Miracle Team
    1980miraclemonument.org
    Home Theater Geeks: Sacramento Sanctuary 
    Sacramento Sanctuary - Home Theater of the Month Interview!
    The LG Evo AI G5 OLED the New Standard for TV
    OLED TVs have consistently delivered the best picture quality in our head-to-head tests -- with the best shadow detail, contrast, color and black levels. Yet, there is one thing LCD-based TVs have always done better: sheer brightness. That is, until the 2025 LG G5 came along. Finally, OLED can reclaim its place at the top of the TV technology leader board with a model that performs brilliantly in almost every single respect. Maybe the forthcoming LG G6 will be even better? Full article here…
     PROS
    Highest brightness of any OLED TV yet 
    Stunning image quality 
    Best color accuracy of every TV in 2025
     CONS
    Brightness boost not visible in all content 
    Remote is not as good as previous versions 
    Expensive
  • HDTV and Home Theater Podcast

    Podcast #1241: Expensive Audio Wires are Bananas!

    20/02/2026 | 40 mins.
    On this week's show we review the Aqara FP2 Presence Sensor and ask are expensive audio wires bananas? We also read your emails and take a look at the week's news. 
    News:
    Netflix is about to stop working on some older smart TVs and consoles
    Another Cable TV Network Announces It Will Shut Down in April
    Broadband Usage Jumps by 9.9% in Q4
    Peacock Strikes Gold With Outsized Olympics, Super Bowl Audiences
    Other:
    Neil Blanchard  "transmission line"Designs
    Aqara FP2 Presence Sensor Review
    The Aqara Presence Sensor FP2 (Buy Now $83) is a game-changer for smart home enthusiasts. Its standout feature is the ability to divide a room of 40㎡ or ~430 sq ft into multiple (up to 30) distinct zones using advanced mmWave radar technology. This allows for some really cool home automations like triggering kitchen lights when someone enters the boundary. This effectively allows one sensor to act like up to 30 allowing personalized scenes based on exact positions far beyond what standard motion sensors can do.
    Features:
    𝐌𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢-𝐙𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 - monitor areas up to 40㎡ (430 sq ft). Create up to 30 zones (e.g., sofa, bed, desk) and assign custom automations to each. 
    𝐌𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢-𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧 & 𝐅𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 detect up to 5 people at the same time and trigger different scenarios and automation. 
    Ultra-high Precision with More Privacy You can define interference areas in the application, exclude objects such as plants, curtains, or pets, and set the filter height to ignore fan movement, ensuring that human presence is accurately detected. With an IPX5 waterproof rating, FP2 is also ideal for humid environments like bathrooms.
    Multi-Ecosystem Support The Aqara Presence Sensor is exposed as multiple sensors to HomeKit, Alexa, Google Home and Home Assistant. 
    Built-In Light Sensor & Local Automations The Aqara FP2 has a built-in light sensor, which provides greater flexibility and enjoyment when creating lighting automations (Only available in Aqara Home, HomeKit, and IFTTT). 
    I set one up in the family room which has line of sight to the kitchen. For the review I set up two zones, one in the family room and one in the kitchen. It's straightforward to do in the Aqara app. Once you set up a zone you name it and it appears as a new sensor in your preferred automation app. If there is motion in the zone you just defined the sensor moves to the triggered state. In my house the lights in the kitchen dim to 40% at 8:45PM. Now when someone goes into the kitchen after 8:45PM the light goes to 100% until they leave. And the response is almost instantaneous. The sensor connects to your home via bluetooth so no wonky wifi issues either.
    Highly recommended for anyone wanting precise, creative control! However the price is a little on the steep side. 
    Expensive Audio Wires are Bananas!
    Quite a few years ago there was a post at Audioholics that was eventually picked up by members of AVS forum that showed in blind testing, audiophiles could not tell the difference in sound quality between expensive speaker wire and coat hangers. This was back in 2008 and most of the links are dead but we will include what we can at the end of this post.  This week we received an email from a listener, Ray, pointing us to an article by Tom's Guide which piggybacks on this concept.  
    A moderator (username "Pano") on the diyAudio forum conducted a blind listening experiment to test whether audiophiles could distinguish audio signals passed through unconventional "conductors" versus standard copper wire. The test compared four recordings of the same audio track. While not exactly the same as the original Audioholics experiment. The results are pretty astonishing. This is how the recordings were made:
    Direct/original CD file.
    Sent through ~180 cm of professional audio copper wire.
    Sent through ~20 cm of wet mud connected by 120cm of old microphone cable soldered to US pennies.
    Sent through a ~13 cm banana connected by the microphone cable and US Pennies.
    Results:
    Participants listened to sound clips in a blind ABX-style format and attempted to identify differences or match them to the original.
    Listeners (experienced audiophiles and forum members) could not reliably tell the difference between the signals, even when comparing high-end copper wire to absurd alternatives like a banana or wet mud.
    The experiment creator noted: "The mud should sound perfectly awful, but it doesn't," highlighting the unexpected lack of audible degradation.
    Explanation for results: All tested materials (including wet mud and banana) had sufficiently low resistance for short lengths to pass the audio signal with minimal measurable or audible alteration at typical speaker-level or line-level voltages; resistance differences were too small to impact perceptible sound quality in the setup.
    The article frames this as evidence challenging extreme audiophile claims about expensive cables/speaker wires making significant audible differences, as even highly conductive everyday/organic materials performed indistinguishably in blind conditions.
    Implications: Reinforces arguments from audio science communities that many perceived cable differences are placebo or expectation bias rather than objectively audible when properly controlled for.
    Links to the original Hanger Stories:
    Audiophiles Can't Tell The Difference Between Monster Cable and Coat Hangers
    Speakers; When is good enough, enough
    Audiophiles can't tell the difference between Monster Cable and coat hangers
    Audiophile Deathmatch: Monster Cables vs. a Coat Hanger
  • HDTV and Home Theater Podcast

    Podcast #1240: Ara's New Home Design (Network, Smart Home, and AV)

    13/02/2026 | 44 mins.
    On this week's show we discuss the details of Ara's new home's layout offering his perspectives on his choices for network, home theater, whole home audio and smart home functionality.  We also read your emails and take a look at the week's news.
    News:
    Kodak Luma 500 - Review
    Launch date, channel list for YouTube TV sports plan revealed
    Sony, the pioneer of Blu-ray Disc recorders, to pull plug on sales
    Price concerns remain the leading reason for streaming cancelations
    Other:
     IKEA Smart Home Without Dirigera: Homey Pro, Home Assistant, HomeKit, Google, Alexa & Aqara
    Ara's New Home Design (Network, Smart Home, and AV)
    Last week Ara was out in Franklin TN meeting with electricians and security contractors to prewire his house with everything he needs to make adding smart home devices and A/V a snap. So what did he do? But first an email from longtime listener Jorge Beltran with some recommendations.
    Jorge's email 
    Guys:
    I am listening to the latest episode on a train delay in freezing NJ.  I heard the question about sound bar vs 3.1 system vs full surround.
    I advocate that if money permits and a remodel situation allows it, I would significantly recommend trying to install 5.1, 7.2, or you name it.
    I have a full theater with 11.2 in the basement that we enjoy and I adore. But we keep watching more and more in the family room next to the kitchen for whatever reason.  And I do enjoy a lot having a surround setup there too and kept adding to it (it was pre wired on a remodel). There was a high WAF in that room, so I went with in-walls for fronts and in-ceiling for rear surround and a couple more for front ATMOS.  Yes, the surrounds and ceiling speakers are not at the ideal locations but they really, really add to the experience, even for the super bowl ambiance.  
    A friend of mine just upgraded his whole house and used KEF on-walls, very thin, good looking, placed a bit higher and almost looked like a decoration in a more contemporary home.  The wife gave them a big approval.  I checked after looking at my wife's face but are out of my price range.
    For you Ara, another friend, a latin party guy, installed 6 speakers on vaulted ceilings in the family room next to a kitchen and surrounded by windows, and they work really great.
    Thus, my vote for Ara is to add ceiling speakers on his vault for surround effects.  Ask the builder to wire them and box them out like a traditional speaker and place them on the rafters.  You build so many speaker boxes already, this one can be made of MDF.  Even better, build your own speaker out of parts, install it on the rafters just below the sheetrock, add a grill and you have the best sounding and looking in-walls ever.
    Last one, a builder friend just added in walls / in ceilings that go behind the sheetrock.  I have not seen them yet.  No excuses gents.
    Sending a CafPow for the extra spackle.
    Jorge
    Ara's Setup
    Wifi and Network decision - Ubiquiti Dream Wi-Fi 6 $350 & Ubiquiti Networks UniFi 7 Pro Access Point (POE) $180
    Cameras, doorbell, motion sensors - Aqara 4MP Camera Hub G5 Pro PoE  $190 & Aqara Smart Doorbell Camera G410  $130 & Aqara Presence Sensor FP2, mmWave Radar Wired Smart Motion Sensor $58
    Light switches - Lutron Caseta Original Smart Dimmer Switch Kit w/ Hub $115. I am only having the company install one or two, I will do the rest as I learn our new routine and decide which switches need automation. I will make use of lamp modules as I prefer those types of lights to recessed lights. 
    Whole Home Audio - Ara to build/buy speakers and connect to the network via ethernet cables using WiiM Amp: Multiroom Streaming Amplifier $300
    TV and Home Theater - For the family room I will use a large format TV with a soundbar. Right now I am leaning towards Sonos Beam Gen 2 and their wireless subwoofer (Sonos Sub 4 $760). For my theater in an upstairs den I will do a traditional setup with atmos. It will consist of an UST, Receiver, and 7.1.2 speakers. Eventually I will build out a more formal theater in the basement. If I live long enough LOL
    No traditional Cable RG6
  • HDTV and Home Theater Podcast

    Podcast #1239: HDTV Display Technologies That Are No Longer With Us

    06/02/2026 | 41 mins.
    On today's show we look at HDTV Display Technologies that are no longer with us. Some had a short run and some never made it to the market. We also read your emails and take a look at the week's news.
    News:
    LG pulls the plug on 8K OLED and 8K LCD TVs
    Apple's home hub could finally arrive this spring with a rather unique design
    Roku is Testing a New Home Screen With A New Look
    Google Home update brings more automation controls
    HDTV Display Technologies That Are No Longer With Us
    Over the 21 years we have been doing the show we have seen numerous HDTV display technologies come and go. Some never made it to market and some had a good run but were eventually beat out by something better. These technologies competed during the transition from bulky CRTs to flat panels, but most lost out as LCD, later becoming LED-backlit LCD, then OLED, became dominant for reasons like cost, scalability, picture quality improvements, and manufacturing ease.
    Technologies That Were Proposed/Demonstrated but Never Commercially Released to Consumers
    SED (Surface-Conduction Electron-Emitter Display)
    Developed primarily by a Canon and Toshiba joint venture starting in the late 1990s/early 2000s. It was essentially a flat-panel evolution of CRT technology using electron emitters for each pixel, promising CRT-like motion handling, deep blacks, high contrast, fast response times, and low power in a slim form factor. Prototypes were shown around 2005–2007 with impressive demos.
    Why it didn't make it: Repeated delays due to manufacturing challenges (high production costs, difficulty scaling/vacuum sealing), patent disputes, and aggressive price drops in LCD/plasma panels. Then by 2009–2010, LCD had become too dominant and cheap; Canon officially froze consumer SED development in 2010, shifting any remaining efforts to niche professional uses.
    FED (Field-Emission Display)
    Similar to SED and sometimes grouped together or seen as a precursor/variant. FED used field-emission electron sources (like microtips) for CRT-style performance in a flat panel. Demonstrated in prototypes in the 2000s by companies like Sony and Motorola.
    Why it didn't make it: Development took too long; manufacturing complexity and yield issues made it unviable. It was overtaken by faster-scaling plasma and then LCD/OLED technologies before reaching mass production.
    Technologies That Reached the Market but Were Discontinued
    DLP (Digital Light Processing) Rear-Projection TVs
    Used Texas Instruments' DMD (digital micromirror device) chips to reflect light, often with a color wheel for sequential color (or pricier 3-chip versions). Popular in the mid-2000s for large-screen (50–70+ inch) HDTVs from brands like Samsung, Mitsubishi, RCA, and Toshiba, offering good brightness, no burn-in, and sharp images at competitive prices.
    Why discontinued: Bulky depth (even if thinner than CRT rear-projection), lamp replacements needed, rainbow artifacts (on single-chip models), poor off-angle viewing, and vulnerability to ambient light. As flat-panel LCD and plasma prices fell dramatically in the late 2000s, consumers preferred slim, wall-mountable designs. Rear-projection DLP TVs largely vanished by around 2010.
    LCOS (Liquid Crystal on Silicon) / Variants like D-ILA (JVC) and SXRD (Sony)
    A reflective microdisplay tech using liquid crystals on a silicon backplane, often in rear-projection or some front-projection setups. Offered excellent contrast, deep blacks, and smooth motion (better than early LCDs). Available in HDTVs from JVC, Sony, and others in the mid-2000s.
    Why largely discontinued for direct-view TVs: High cost, manufacturing complexity, and lower brightness compared to emerging flat panels. Rear-projection versions suffered the same bulkiness issues as DLP. While LCOS survives today in high-end projectors mostly in JVC and Sony home theater models, it never scaled to mainstream direct-view flat-panel HDTVs and was eclipsed by LCD advancements.
    Plasma Display Panel (PDP / Plasma TVs)
    Used ionized gas (plasma) cells to create light, excelling in black levels, contrast, color accuracy, wide viewing angles, and no motion blur. Very popular for HDTV in the 2000s from Panasonic, Pioneer, Samsung, and LG.
    Why discontinued: High power consumption, heat generation, heavier panels, burn-in risk (though mitigated later), and difficulty scaling to 4K efficiently/cost-effectively. As LCD/LED prices dropped with better brightness, efficiency, and no burn-in, plasma couldn't compete economically. Production fully ended around 2014–2015.
    Other Notable Mentions
    LCD Rear-Projection TVs — Used transmissive LCD panels; suffered from similar bulk and light issues as DLP; discontinued early-mid 2000s.
    Direct-view CRT HDTVs — The original standard; fully discontinued by the late 2000s/early 2010s due to size, weight, and inefficiency.
    Key Reasons Technologies Fail in HDTV Market
    Regardless of how good a display technology is, the following will keep it from the mass market:
    Cost & Manufacturing Yield: Technologies requiring ultra-precise processes (SED, FED, LCoS) couldn't hit competitive prices. 
    Competing Technologies Improve Fast: LCD and later LED/OLED got cheaper and better quicker than rivals could scale.
    Form Factor Shift: Direct-view panels beat rear-projection (DLP, LCoS, laser) because consumers prefer thin TVs.
    Performance Tradeoffs: Issues like power use, burn-in, brightness, viewing angles, or reliability hurt consumer uptake. 
    In summary, the winners were technologies that scaled cheaply to larger sizes, became thinner/lighter, improved efficiency, and avoided major drawbacks like high costs or reliability issues. LCD/LED dominated the 2010s due to mass production advantages, while OLED took premium segments later for superior contrast/per-pixel lighting. Many promising "next-gen" ideas from the 2000s (like SED/FED) simply arrived too late or proved too hard to manufacture affordably.

More News podcasts

About HDTV and Home Theater Podcast

The HT Guys, Ara Derderian and Braden Russell, are Engineers who formerly worked for the Advanced Digital Systems Group (ADSG) of Sony Pictures Entertainment. ADSG was the R&D unit of the sound department producing products for movie theaters and movie studios. Two of the products they worked on include the DCP-1000 and DADR-5000. The DCP is a digital cinema processor used in movie theaters around the world. The DADR-5000 is a disk-based audio dubber used on Hollywood sound stages. ADSG was awarded a Technical Academy Award by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in 2000 for the development of the DADR-5000. Ara holds three patents for his development work in Digital Cinema and Digital Audio Recording. Every week they put together a podcast about High Definition TV and Home Theater. Each episode brings news from the A/V world, helpful product reviews and insights and help in demystifying and simplifying HDTV and home theater. Our email address is [email protected]
Podcast website

Listen to HDTV and Home Theater Podcast, Newscast and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features
Social
v8.7.2 | © 2007-2026 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 3/7/2026 - 1:18:56 AM