3 Takeaways™

What if AI becomes easier to talk to than another person?
And what happens to us when it does?
MIT professor Sherry Turkle has spent decades studying what technology does to the way we think, work, and love. Now she says there are two parts of our lives we should never let AI into.
She discusses:
Why ordinary conversation has started to feel like work
The surprising reason people may prefer talking to chatbots
How AI will change what we expect from other people
Why “pretend empathy” may be more dangerous than it seems
What happens when relationships become frictionless
What it could mean for a child to have an AI friend
Whether AI could make us worse at being with each other
The question isn’t just what AI can do. It’s what AI may do to us.

Mark Cuban told people that television would eventually be delivered over the internet. 

Everybody thought he was an idiot.

Now, Cuban is making another prediction that runs counter to what we all believe, but this time it's about A.I.

Few people have made as many big bets across as many industries as Mark Cuban. The billionaire entrepreneur and investor has built businesses in technology and media, transformed the NBA's Dallas Mavericks, and is now taking on prescription drug companies with Cost Plus Drugs.

He discusses:
● What everyone may be getting wrong about AI
● What he sees happening to jobs and where the real opportunity may be
● The one thing he believes AI will never replace
● How he decides whether a seemingly crazy idea is actually an opportunity
● The quality he looks for after seeing thousands of entrepreneurs
● The mistake incredibly smart people make again and again
● Why one of his biggest decisions required him to become “the younger Mark Cuban” again
● Why being wrong repeatedly may not matter nearly as much as we think
● What success means to him now that money is no longer the measure
● What he thinks most Americans still don’t understand about healthcare
Mark Cuban saw streaming coming and almost nobody believed him. What does he see now that the rest of us may be missing?

What if the president can act before Congress has time to stop him?

As former U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, former General Counsel of the Department of Defense, and a member of the National Security Council, Jeh Johnson has advised presidents on war, terrorism, cyber threats, and some of the country’s most consequential national security decisions.

He has seen what happens when the pressure to “do something” collides with incomplete intelligence, rapidly changing facts, political pressure, and enormous presidential power.

He discusses:

● Why “Mr. President, do something” can be dangerous advice
● Why Congress has formally declared war in only five conflicts in U.S. history
● How much military force a president can order without first going to Congress
● What happens to constitutional checks and balances when weapons can strike in minutes
● Why presidential power looks different from inside the Oval Office
● What actually happens inside the Situation Room when the intelligence is incomplete and the stakes are enormous
● The threat that worries him the most

The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war. But modern military strikes and warfare can move extraordinarily fast. 

So who can stop a president from starting a war? Where are the limits on presidential power when a decision has to be made in minutes? And when the law leaves enormous discretion in the hands of one person, how much ultimately depends on that person’s judgment and restraint?

What if trying harder is sometimes exactly the wrong thing to do?
Angela Duckworth, University of Pennsylvania psychologist, MacArthur Fellow, and author of the #1 New York Times bestseller Grit, has spent years studying achievement. In her new book, Situated, she explores why perseverance alone isn't enough.
She discusses:
How Angela and her husband nearly “gritted” their way out of their marriage
How much your environment shapes who you become
The small change that can make good habits easier
Why parents may be asking the wrong question about their children
How peer pressure can become a force for good
Whether AI could make us worse at thinking
When changing your situation matters more than changing yourself
We spend enormous energy trying to improve ourselves. Angela Duckworth asks a different question: what if the more important thing is to change what’s around us?

What can we do when doing the morally “right” thing produces worse outcomes?

And what if some of society’s strongest moral instincts are preventing us from solving problems we all agree are terrible?

Alvin Roth is a Stanford professor and Nobel Prize-winning economist whose work has helped redesign real-world systems, including kidney exchanges and the way doctors are matched with hospitals. His new book, Moral Economics, tackles a harder category of problems: markets and behaviors we find morally objectionable, even when banning them may create consequences we don’t want.

He discusses:
Why nearly 100,000 Americans can be waiting for a kidney 
What prohibitions of alcohol and heroin can teach us 
What happened when Rhode Island accidentally legalized indoor prostitution
Whether paying kidney donors could save lives without creating an ethically unacceptable market
Why evidence becomes especially important when reasonable people disagree about morality
Whether performance-enhancing drugs could eventually become as ordinary as coffee
Some policies sound obviously right when judged by their intentions. But what happens when you judge them by their actual consequences?

Roth pushes into the uncomfortable territory between those two questions: when banning something creates a black market, when changing a rule may save more lives than inventing a new technology, and what we should do when the outcome we believe is morally necessary turns out to be something we cannot actually achieve.