Warner Bros has agreed a binding merger deal with Netflix for its film and streaming business, offering a deal worth $72bn. Shortly after, Paramount returned with a higher bid to acquire the entire Warner Bros group at over $108bn. On paper, the numbers look compelling. In practice, the deal structure, funding, and risk profile tell a very different story.
So far, the Warner Bros board has rejected Paramount’s, pointing to debt heavy financing, execution risk, and the high cost of walking away from an existing binding agreement with Netflix. This is not just about price. It is about certainty, stability, and long-term value.
Why would directors turn down more money? What makes one buyer safer than another? And where do lawyers shape the outcome of deals like this?
The Commercial Awareness Compass by AllAboutLaw, helps you build your commercial awareness every week with a beginners, intermediate and advanced breakdown of a story from an expert lawyer and trainee solicitor host.
This story was taken from a live conversation a few months ago. If you don't want to wait for these conversations, head over to the Commercial Awareness Compass to get them straight to your inbox each week.
🚀 Boost your commercial awareness: https://www.allaboutlaw.co.uk/commercial-awareness-compass